OBB Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to subscribe to the Orange Book Blog newsletter. If a new post is added during the day, you'll receive it by e-mail the next morning.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis Feed Button

Disclaimer

  • Orange Book Blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of Orange Book Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. Orange Book Blog is Aaron Barkoff's personal website and it is intended primarily for other attorneys. Orange Book Blog is not edited by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP ("MBHB") or its clients. Therefore, no part of Orange Book Blog--whether information, commentary, or other--may be attributed to MBHB or its clients. Readers should be aware that MBHB represents many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and therefore Orange Book Blog may occasionally report on news that relates to MBHB clients. Orange Book Blog will always strive to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on Orange Book Blog should be double-checked for its accuracy and current applicability. -- © Aaron F. Barkoff 2006-08

« Welcome to Orange Book Blog! | Main | Public Comment Period on FTC's Authorized Generics Study Ends June 5, 2006 »

May 09, 2006

FTC Commissioner Speaks on Settlements in Pharmaceutical Patent Cases

The Federal Trade Commission recently published the remarks of Commissioner Jon Leibowitz regarding trends in settlements of patent lawsuits between innovator and generic drug companies.  Commissioner Leibowitz made his remarks in a speech at the 2nd Annual In-House Counsel's Forum on Pharmaceutical Antitrust, on April 24th in Philadelphia.  On the same day, the FTC released its latest annual report on patent settlements between innovators and generics.  While the entire speech is well worth reading, the following comments are especially interesting:

  • until the Schering and Tamoxifen cases, almost no settlements involved a cash payment from the innovator to the generic; since those cases, more than two-thirds of settlements have included such payments;
  • unless the Supreme Court reverses the Schering and Tamoxifen decisions, the innovator and generic drug companies "will have carte blanche to avoid competition and share resulting profits, and we will see minimal competition before patent expiration";
  • rather than settling with only the first ANDA filer, in some cases the innovator company is settling with all ANDA filers to guarantee no generic entry until a date that's usually very near patent expiration;
  • since the Federal Circuit decision in Teva v. Pfizer, some innovators have been pursuing a strategy of settling with the first ANDA filer and declining to sue any subsequent filers, which could effectively block all generic entry until patent expiration.

RELATED READING:

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.