OBB Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to subscribe to the Orange Book Blog newsletter. If a new post is added during the day, you'll receive it by e-mail the next morning.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis Feed Button

Disclaimer

  • Orange Book Blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of Orange Book Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. Orange Book Blog is Aaron Barkoff's personal website and it is intended primarily for other attorneys. Orange Book Blog is not edited by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP ("MBHB") or its clients. Therefore, no part of Orange Book Blog--whether information, commentary, or other--may be attributed to MBHB or its clients. Readers should be aware that MBHB represents many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and therefore Orange Book Blog may occasionally report on news that relates to MBHB clients. Orange Book Blog will always strive to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on Orange Book Blog should be double-checked for its accuracy and current applicability. -- © Aaron F. Barkoff 2006-08

« FDA Updates Status of Its Response to Zocor Citizen Petitions | Main | Orange Book Blog Logo! »

July 31, 2006

GPhA Releases Its Own Study On Authorized Generics

The Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA), the trade group representing generic drug makers, released a study today concluding that authorized generics do not save consumers money and ultimately will lead to higher drug prices.  GPhA's study, conducted by a law professor and an economics professor, appears to be a reaction to PhRMA's study, released last month, reaching the opposite conclusion.

According to GPhA's press release, its study:

conclusively demonstrates that the anti-competitive brand pharmaceutical practice of introducing authorized generics (AGs) "significantly reduce incentives for independent generic firms to challenge invalid brand name patents and to develop non-infringing processes."  This analysis also raised serious questions about the validity of a recent PhRMA study on authorized generics, noting that the PhRMA study contained significant errors making its conclusions questionable at best.

In response, PhRMA issued its own press release today, defending its study as sound.

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.