OBB Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to subscribe to the Orange Book Blog newsletter. If a new post is added during the day, you'll receive it by e-mail the next morning.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis Feed Button

Disclaimer

  • Orange Book Blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of Orange Book Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. Orange Book Blog is Aaron Barkoff's personal website and it is intended primarily for other attorneys. Orange Book Blog is not edited by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP ("MBHB") or its clients. Therefore, no part of Orange Book Blog--whether information, commentary, or other--may be attributed to MBHB or its clients. Readers should be aware that MBHB represents many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and therefore Orange Book Blog may occasionally report on news that relates to MBHB clients. Orange Book Blog will always strive to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on Orange Book Blog should be double-checked for its accuracy and current applicability. -- © Aaron F. Barkoff 2006-08

« ViroPharma Pursues Citizen Petition to Block FDA Approval of Generic Vancomycin | Main | Apotex Launches Generic Plavix At Risk »

August 06, 2006

Abbott and Teva Settle Patent Litigation Over Biaxin XL

          by David Harper

Abbott Laboratories and Teva Pharmaceuticals have settled their Biaxin XL patent infringement litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.  Biaxin XL is an extended release formulation of clarithromycin used to treat bacterial respiratory infections, with over $1 billion in annual sales.

The parties filed a stipulation of dismissal with the District Court on July 31.  Terms of the settlement were not available in published court documents.  However, a spokeman for Teva reportedly stated that pursuant to the settlement agreement, Teva would not sell its generic version of Biaxin XL "at this time," suggesting that Teva plans to do so in the future.

In June, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's preliminary injunction order and soon after, Teva began selling generic Biaxin XL.  Then, the district court ruled that its preliminary injunction order would remain binding on Teva unless and until a mandate issued from the Federal Circuit vacating the preliminary injunction.  Teva then announced that it would voluntarily pull all of its generic Biaxin XL off the market.  Later, Abbott filed a motion to compel the recall of all of Teva's generic Biaxin XL that Teva had already sold to its customers.

The settlement agreement does not end all disputes over generic Biaxin XL, as litigation against Andrx Pharmaceuticals and Roxane Laboratories remains pending.

Comments

am a pharmacy technician in florida, just wondering why was biaxin xl pulled off the market

thanks

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.