OBB Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to subscribe to the Orange Book Blog newsletter. If a new post is added during the day, you'll receive it by e-mail the next morning.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis Feed Button

Disclaimer

  • Orange Book Blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of Orange Book Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. Orange Book Blog is Aaron Barkoff's personal website and it is intended primarily for other attorneys. Orange Book Blog is not edited by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP ("MBHB") or its clients. Therefore, no part of Orange Book Blog--whether information, commentary, or other--may be attributed to MBHB or its clients. Readers should be aware that MBHB represents many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and therefore Orange Book Blog may occasionally report on news that relates to MBHB clients. Orange Book Blog will always strive to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on Orange Book Blog should be double-checked for its accuracy and current applicability. -- © Aaron F. Barkoff 2006-08

« Rep. Waxman Announces Plan to Introduce Biogenerics Legislation; Governors Petition FDA on Biogenerics | Main | Takeda Wins Attorneys' Fees in ANDA Case Against Alphapharm and Mylan Relating to ACTOS »

September 21, 2006

Federal Circuit Denies Apotex's Request to Stay Preliminary Injunction on Generic Plavix Sales, and Sets Expedited Schedule for Appeal

Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb announced in a press release today that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has refused Apotex's motion to stay the preliminary injunction against Apotex's sales of its generic version of Plavix.  Additionally, the CAFC established an expedited schedule for Apotex's appeal of the preliminary injunction order, with oral argument set for October 31, 2006.

Here's a brief history of the case:

  • July 11, 1989:  Sanofi is awarded U.S. Patent No. 4,847,265 on clopidrogel bisulfate, the active ingredient of Plavix;
  • November, 1997:  FDA approves Plavix for the prevention of heart attack and stroke;
  • November, 2001:  Apotex files ANDA for clopidrogel bisulfate, ten years before the '265 patent will expire;
  • March 21, 2002:  S-A and BMS (Sanofi's marketing partner for Plavix in the U.S.) file a patent infringement suit against Apotex; Apotex counters that the '265 patent is invalid as anticipated and obvious, as well as unenforceable;
  • January, 2006:  the parties reach a preliminary settlement of the patent litigation;
  • January 20, 2006:  FDA approves Apotex's ANDA;
  • July 28, 2006:  state attorneys general reject the final settlement agreement;
  • August 8, 2006:  Apotex launches its generic Plavix product;
  • August 15, 2006:  S-A and BMS file motion for preliminary injunction;
  • August 31, 2006:  In a 58-page opinion, S.D.N.Y grants motion for preliminary injunction;
  • September 1, 2006:  S.D.N.Y. denies Apotex's motion to stay preliminary injunction;
  • September, 2006:  Apotex appeals to CAFC and files motion to stay preliminary injunction;
  • September 20, 2006:  CAFC denies Apotex's motion to stay; sets expedited appeal schedule.

Plavix, which is taken daily by 48 million Americans, had annual global sales of nearly $6 billion before Apotex launched its generic version last month.  According to published reports, Apotex had sold wholesalers over a year's supply of its generic Plavix before its sales were halted by the preliminary injunction.  The wholesalers are allowed to sell the generic Plavix they already have in stock while Apotex's appeal is pending.

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.