OBB Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to subscribe to the Orange Book Blog newsletter. If a new post is added during the day, you'll receive it by e-mail the next morning.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis Feed Button

Disclaimer

  • Orange Book Blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of Orange Book Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. Orange Book Blog is Aaron Barkoff's personal website and it is intended primarily for other attorneys. Orange Book Blog is not edited by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP ("MBHB") or its clients. Therefore, no part of Orange Book Blog--whether information, commentary, or other--may be attributed to MBHB or its clients. Readers should be aware that MBHB represents many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and therefore Orange Book Blog may occasionally report on news that relates to MBHB clients. Orange Book Blog will always strive to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on Orange Book Blog should be double-checked for its accuracy and current applicability. -- © Aaron F. Barkoff 2006-08

« ABA Section of Antitrust Law Presents Discussion of Authorized Generics | Main | Alza Loses Appeal of Ditropan XL Case to Mylan »

September 17, 2006

Pfizer's Patent on Norvasc Survives Challenge by Synthon

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina recently found Pfizer's patent on the active ingredient of Norvasc, amlodipine besylate, valid and infringed by Synthon's generic equivalent.  Norvasc, a treatment for hypertension, has annual sales of nearly $5 billion.

In the opinion, Judge James A. Beaty, Jr. concluded that Pfizer's U.S. Patent No. 4,879,303 was not invalid for obviousness, lack of written description, or double patenting.  According to Pfizer's press release announcing the court decision, in January the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois found the same patent valid and infringed by Apotex.

As reported in Orange Book Blog last month, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently found that Pfizer did not infringe Synthon's patent on a process for making amlipodine.

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.