OBB Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to subscribe to the Orange Book Blog newsletter. If a new post is added during the day, you'll receive it by e-mail the next morning.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis Feed Button

Disclaimer

  • Orange Book Blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of Orange Book Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. Orange Book Blog is Aaron Barkoff's personal website and it is intended primarily for other attorneys. Orange Book Blog is not edited by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP ("MBHB") or its clients. Therefore, no part of Orange Book Blog--whether information, commentary, or other--may be attributed to MBHB or its clients. Readers should be aware that MBHB represents many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and therefore Orange Book Blog may occasionally report on news that relates to MBHB clients. Orange Book Blog will always strive to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on Orange Book Blog should be double-checked for its accuracy and current applicability. -- © Aaron F. Barkoff 2006-08

« FTC and Warner Chilcott Settle Antitrust Case Over Ovcon 35 | Main | Hoffman-LaRoche's Motion to Dismiss EPO Case On Basis of 271(e)(1) Research Exemption Is Denied »

October 24, 2006

Johnson & Johnson Wins Preliminary Injunction Against Mylan in Topamax Suit

Ortho-McNeil Neurologics, a unit of Johnson & Johnson, announced in a press release today that it won a preliminary injunction against Mylan in its patent infringement case aimed to protect Topamax (topiramate) from generic competition.  Topamax, indicated for the treatment of epilepsy and migraines, had U.S. sales of $1.4 billion last year.

Judge Stanley R. Chesler of the U.S. District Court for District of New Jersey wrote the opinion, in which he concluded that the patent in suit is likely to withstand Mylan's obviousness defense because Mylan had not presented suffcient evidence of a "motivation, suggestion, or teaching" to modify the prior art.  Thus, this is yet another recent case turning on the Federal Circuit's suggestion test, the merits of which are currently under consideration by the Supreme Court in KSR v. Teleflex.  Earlier this year, Judge Chesler dismissed Mylan's inequitable conduct, non-enablement, and indefiniteness allegations on summary judgment.

Ortho-McNeil filed its motion for a preliminary injunction last July "to preserve the status quo" and prevent an at-risk launch when its 30-month stay expired in September.  Ortho-McNeil's patent on topiramate, U.S. Patent No. 4,513,006, will not expire until September, 2008.

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.