OBB Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to subscribe to the Orange Book Blog newsletter. If a new post is added during the day, you'll receive it by e-mail the next morning.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis Feed Button

Disclaimer

  • Orange Book Blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of Orange Book Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. Orange Book Blog is Aaron Barkoff's personal website and it is intended primarily for other attorneys. Orange Book Blog is not edited by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP ("MBHB") or its clients. Therefore, no part of Orange Book Blog--whether information, commentary, or other--may be attributed to MBHB or its clients. Readers should be aware that MBHB represents many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and therefore Orange Book Blog may occasionally report on news that relates to MBHB clients. Orange Book Blog will always strive to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on Orange Book Blog should be double-checked for its accuracy and current applicability. -- © Aaron F. Barkoff 2006-08

« ACI "3rd Annual In-House Counsel Forum on Pharmaceutical Antitrust," May 15-16, New York City | Main | News From PhRMA Annual Meeting »

March 15, 2007

Decision on Tamoxifen Cert Petition Expected Soon

According to this article in today's Legal Times, the Supreme Court may decide as early as next Monday whether or not to grant certiorari in In Re: Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litigation, the latest "reverse payment" settlement case to be presented to the Court.

In the case, patients, health insurance companies, and consumer advocacy groups are challenging the legality of a patent litigation settlement that included a $21 million payment from AstraZeneca to Barr Labs and an agreement by Barr to delay marketing its generic tamoxifen product until Astra's patent expired.  Tamoxifen, a treatment for breast cancer, is the most widely prescribed cancer drug in the world.

Last year, the Court denied certiorari in a similar case, FTC v. Schering.  There, the Court asked for the views of the Solicitor General, who recommended denying cert.  At the time, the Solicitor General suggested that the Tamoxifen case might present a better vehicle for addressing the issue of reverse payment settlements.  The Court has not yet asked the Solicitor General to submit an amicus brief in Tamoxifen, but that remains a possibility.

Links to the petition stage briefs are provided below.  Thanks very much to everyone who sent me copies of the briefs.

BRIEFS:

RELATED READING:

UPDATES:

  • On March 18, the Supreme Court asked the Solicitor General to file an amicus brief setting forth the Government's position on the case.  Thus, the Court may not decide until Fall whether or not to take this case.  Patently-O has more.

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.