OBB Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to subscribe to the Orange Book Blog newsletter. If a new post is added during the day, you'll receive it by e-mail the next morning.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

AddThis Feed Button

Disclaimer

  • Orange Book Blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of Orange Book Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. Orange Book Blog is Aaron Barkoff's personal website and it is intended primarily for other attorneys. Orange Book Blog is not edited by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP ("MBHB") or its clients. Therefore, no part of Orange Book Blog--whether information, commentary, or other--may be attributed to MBHB or its clients. Readers should be aware that MBHB represents many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and therefore Orange Book Blog may occasionally report on news that relates to MBHB clients. Orange Book Blog will always strive to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on Orange Book Blog should be double-checked for its accuracy and current applicability. -- © Aaron F. Barkoff 2006-08

« ACI "Pharma/Biotech Patent Boot Camp" Conference, June 21-22, New York City | Main | Pharma News Briefs »

June 06, 2007

District Court Invalidates McNeil's Formulation Patent on Pepcid Complete, Relying on KSR v. Teleflex

McNeil-PPC et al. v. Perrigo Co., No. 05-1321 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

In an opinion released Tuesday, Judge William H. Pauley III of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that McNeil's patent on the formulation for Pepcid Complete is invalid as obvious, clearing the way for Perrigo Co. to sell its own generic version of the medication.  The decision is one of the first pharmaceutical patent decisions to rely on and quote extensively from the Supreme Court's April 30 decision in KSR v. Teleflex.

The patent-in-suit was McNeil's U.S. Patent No. 5,817,340.  Claim 1 of the '340 patent recites a solid oral dosage form comprising impermeably coated famotidine granules and aluminum hydroxide or magnesium hydroxide.  Pepcid Complete comprises coated famotidine granules (to inhibit stomach acid secretion) and magnesium hydroxide (to neutralize stomach acid already present).  The coating on the famotidine granules is important; without it, magnesium hydroxide would cause famotidine to degrade upon contact.  Additionally, the coating masks the bitter taste of famotidine.

According to Judge Pauley's opinion, two prior art references, "Davis" and "Wolfe," had previously taught the use of famotidine with magnesium hydroxide in a pharmaceutical composition.  Moreover, according to the opinion, two prior art patents, the '072 and '114 patents, taught coating of famotidine granules in order to mask famotidine's bitter taste.

Judge Pauley began his analysis by referring to the "teaching, suggestion, or motivation" test as follows: "Until recently, the Federal Circuit had employed an additional test for determining the obviousness of combining prior art references."  Then, after reviewing the scope and content of the prior art, he stated: "Under KSR, 'the combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results.'  The '340 patent does no more than combine the predictable results of Davis and Wolfe with the predictable results of the '072 and '114 patents."

Judge Pauley went on to imply that even pre-KSR, he would have found the '340 patent invalid as obvious, since one of skill in the art "would have been motivated to use impermeable coating to improve the palatability of a chewable tablet comprised of coated famotidine and antacids."  Nonetheless, the decision is still informative of how district courts are applying KSR to pharmaceutical formulation patents.

Ortho-McNeil, a unit of Johnson & Johnson, markets Pepcid Complete in partnership with Merck.  Pepcid Complete is an over-the-counter product intended for the treatment of heartburn, with annual retail sales of about $90 million.  Perrigo reportedly plans to begin selling its generic version sometime next year, and expects to have 180-day exclusivity when it does.

RELATED READING:

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.